Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luv Puri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Luv Puri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. I added a book review by Kenneth Christie in a scholarly journal, Politics, Religion & Ideology. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:20, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Peter Ormond 💬 00:14, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Doesn't meet GNG, WP:AUTHOR or WP:PROF. I couldn't locate any additional scholarly reviews of his works. TJMSmith (talk) 04:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. _signed, Iflaq ^(talk) 13:27, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.