Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luka Gugeshashvili

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. There's clearly a consensus here that the article meets WP:GNG. No need to draw this out any further. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:46, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Luka Gugeshashvili

Luka Gugeshashvili (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was that the article fails WP:GNG and WP:Notability (sports). PROD was contested on the grounds that he has signed for Jagiellonia Białystok and Granada CF. However, he has not actually played for Jagiellonia and has only ever played for Granada's second team, so this insufficient to satisfy WP:NFOOTBALL. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:01, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:01, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:01, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:21, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - GNG satisfied, a solid amount there by searching his (apparent - I only got it because of transfermarkt) homeland name (ლუკა გუგეშაშვილი): [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] to name a few. Fairly sustained coverage across multiple outlets, most likely additional there for those who are more familiar with the Georgian language and its media. I agree about the article's current state, but that isn't a reason for deletion - it could easily be improved. R96Skinner (talk) 00:39, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Some good finds there, I have changed my vote to Userfy as the page at least needs to go back into a draft state before being placed onto the wiki. HawkAussie (talk) 02:14, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.