Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Preston, Viscountess Gormanston

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. kur ykh 06:05, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy Preston, Viscountess Gormanston

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. She is related to a famous actor by birth and to a minor peer by marriage, neither of which confers notability on her. No significant coverage found. Michig (talk) 23:17, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no need for seperate article on this person. RadManCF (talk) 23:37, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability is not inherited. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 23:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable, as per above. Viridae ^Talk 00:19, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete:Notability is not inherited. Joe Chill (talk) 00:59, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge back into Edward Fox, her father's page. Bearian (talk) 02:22, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:27, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added some references. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:27, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- She seems to be a full-time socialite, but there is enough media coverage of her at this search to make me think she's notable. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:53, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I don't see anything in those results that constitutes significant coverage, although of course if you can point out a couple that do I'll be happy to reconsider. The sources in the article tell us who her family is and that she attended a memorial service, and nothing more as far as I can see.--Michig (talk) 07:55, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unit Anode 03:06, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nobility is not automatically notability. I don't see enough for notability (which requires discussion of the topic, not just mention) in the links provided above by Eastmain. Drmies (talk) 03:14, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The subject simply is not notable. JBsupreme (talk) 08:01, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.