Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loree Rodkin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Stifle (talk) 10:37, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Loree Rodkin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost every single source is an WP:INTERVIEW, with just one exception. In addition, sources in the article (and those that I could find online) seem to be hype and not sustained, or they are passing mentions (... which was designed by Loree Rodkin ...) WP refs search returns most recent result as 2014, for example. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 00:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Coverage in the Daily Mail, New York Post, both are non RS. Chicago Tribune looked promising but it's a Q&A. I can't find stories about her that we can use for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 02:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Reads promotional in nature with all primary sources; doesn't tell us why the subject is notable. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 04:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, California, and Illinois. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• FYI - I have added sources on her later work with Michèle Lamy and the grandson of Kilian Hennessy, and some other content, which includes some articles from British Vogue, Interview magazine, Los Angeles Times, and Hollywood Reporter. Bridget (talk) 18:58, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Article already cites this good LATimes profile. Additional sources include Chicago Tribune (only the second half is interview), W magazine profile, and Arab News (combination interview profile). Hameltion (talk | contribs) 02:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These are indeed all interviews/promotional pieces, and the Chicago Tribune link doesn't work. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 23:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not really, these are mostly much more profile than Q&A, and there's no indication they're promotional in the sense of not being reliable independent sources ... she seems to be a well-covered public figure (archive of Tribune interview) Hameltion (talk | contribs) 13:30, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:05, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Hameltion's sources. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 09:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.