Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lois Appleby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 01:12, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lois Appleby

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable sports administrator with insufficient secondary source coverage, recently created. Orderinchaos 12:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Checked Trove, Newsbank and Google News archives, which only show her being quoted but not about herself. Orderinchaos 12:21, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will be addinng information from the following three references in near future. Significant Australian sport administrator and part of the Australian paralympic Wikipedia History Project. Lois Appleby - personality profile.Rafferty, L., ANZALS Newsletter 1995: Vol. 5 Issue 1. p. 15 Interview with Lois Appleby: CEO of the 2000 Paralympic Games.Sen, T., Sweat May-Aug 1999: Issue 4. p. 18-19 The paralympics' very able organiser. By: Cromie, Ali. BRW. 18/08/1997, Vol. 19 Issue 31, p56. 4p. 5 (talk)

Delete: I would like to vote keep but a review of WorldCat, NewsBank, Trove, Google News, Google Books does nothing to support a vote under WP:GNG and it is unclear under which other criteria the article could be kept like WP:NSPORTS. Plus, the tone of the article is highly promotional. If it is kept, this needs to be removed. --LauraHale (talk) 13:32, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No mainstream coverage about the subject. Read like promo too, but really the lack of coverage is the issue.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 00:57, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:42, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.