Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional secret bases in comics and animation

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of fictional secret bases in comics and animation

List of fictional secret bases in comics and animation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been unreferenced since 2007. This list is original research. Without a secondary source justifying all or most of the list, it needs to go. Rhadow (talk) 13:15, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:02, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete- unsourced fancruft, and does not appear to serve any sort of navigational purpose. Reyk YO! 07:32, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, seems indiscriminate in a way that I don't think can really be fixed through a rename or editing: secret and nonsecret bases, hideouts and...entire planets. And no good reason to limit this to comics and animation. The secret base is a significant trope in fiction, but I think focusing on that would really just be a different list. Category:Fictional secret bases is also being applied indiscriminately (the hidden Batcave is secret, the very public Avengers Mansion is not), and seems to have far too few valid and notable examples to provide guidance for fixing this. postdlf (talk) 15:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:53, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.