Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Seinfeld DVD releases (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Seinfeld. postdlf (talk) 18:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Seinfeld DVD releases

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List reads more like an advertisement or directory is does not hold any encyclopedic value. –Dream out loud (talk) 06:29, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:17, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:17, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:17, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to the main Seinfeld article, but collapse into a more "proper" home media release summary. The details of which episode is on which disc and the extra content tied to each is unnecessary (one can mention in general these episodes sometimes included these extra features), and the list of easter eggs appears as original research. Strip that all out, and you have a nice, concise table to work from. --MASEM (t) 22:21, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as the vital information already exists at Seinfeld#DVD releases. At the very least, merge some additional details. But this standalone article fails GNG. DVD information does not merit its own article. What about VHS releases? -- Wikipedical (talk) 06:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Seinfeld. We don't need a whole separate article for this. Just a collapsible section like Masem detailed. A lot of other TV shows use that method in their respective articles. That's all that's needed. Not all this other trivia and unnecessary detail. StewdioMACK (talk) 17:14, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:49, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 19:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.