User talk:Wikipedical

You've got mail!

Speedy deletion nomination of Monument Valley 2

Battlefront II page move

Move discussion

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Nomination of The One Percent (TV series) for deletion

Category:Wikipedians who like Black Mirror

Greg Pence

Orphaned non-free image File:Paramount Pictures logo (2013).jpg

Page mover granted

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Corporate (TV series)

List of Super Bowls Hi there. I saw you moved List of Super Bowl champions back in 2012 (and immediately reverted yourself). Your edit summary: "Not just winners, a list of games" makes a lot of sense. I've been thinking about it and the page probably should be moved to List of Super Bowls as the list is very much about more than just the champions; it includes information about Super Bowl participants, stadiums, cities, attendance, etc.. Before I open a move request on the talk page I figured I would ask you if you had any specific rationale for moving it back that I should take into consideration?

Thanks, - Paul^T+/_C 19:19, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: List of Super Bowls

Originally posted to my talk page. Moved here to keep the discussion all in one place. I hope you don't mind.

Hey there. I believed (and believe) the name should be moved – because the lists describe much more than just the winners/'champions' – but as I recall I noticed there are many, many other similar pages like List of NBA champions, List of Stanley Cup champions, List of Wimbledon gentlemen's singles champions, etc. So a much larger naming conventions discussion should be initiated instead of a single page move. -- Wikipedical (talk) 16:20, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that a huge discussion beyond something at the talk page of the article is necessary. Just because those other pages exist doesn't mean that they necessarily dictate anything an the Super Bowl page. Unless, is there specific MOS guidance on the topic? I'm not aware of anything that might be relevant. - Paul^T+/_C 03:59, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know of any MOS discussion, but noticing that consistency exists with other articles was my rationale for moving it back. -- Wikipedical (talk) 17:43, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled Deadwood film. Since you had some involvement with the Untitled Deadwood film redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! Then how to link TikTok profiles to list? List of most-followed Instagram accounts have same format. -- CptViraj (📧) 14:06, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Joker (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the Joker (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:47, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For the WDSMP note, it will only be included on the bottom of the page, it will not disrupt from the labeled distributor of the film by 20CF or whoever else, please try to come to some compromise that will allow the mention WDSMP note on the page. The case for 20CF is different from that of Universal or WB, as their owners don’t operate film divisions, for Disney, they have a distribution system that can easily be listed as a small note in the notes section and still allow 20CF to be listed in the primary section. 184.54.163.113 (talk) 03:32, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your OP statement about my comment about it possibly being filmed already. But I would just tell you the film is listed on the Industry standard website IMDB PRO(a valid professional source) as specifically in Pre-production(preparing for filming) with an official Teaser Poster(uploaded just 3 days ago) and logo supplied by the production company. Meaning that it is not in "development hell"(as that is listed on site as "in development") but has in fact been greenlit and is an active film production looking to begin filming with a projected April(/Easter) 2021 release date and an estimated(from the Script) runtime of 167mins.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5795232/

So it is indeed an active film project, and not stuck in development. It's mainly slightly too early(like 6 months really) for a film page just yet. I hope you don't take it the wrong way, just telling you the film is indeed a real legit production with an official projected release date.Colliric (talk) 07:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• User:Colliric, Imdb is generally not considered a reliable source but is used as an external link. Moreover, a film's listing supplied by its own production company is not independent of the subject. Notability is recognized by significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Plus, as WP:NFF notes, "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles." -- Wikipedical (talk) 19:18, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Found this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Archive_74#Revisit_on_RfC

--172.58.99.162 (talk) 18:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2020 in television, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:19, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi User:CASSIOPEIA, I'm a little confused- 2020 in television is purely a disambiguation page and no different than 2019 in television. -- Wikipedical (talk) 19:04, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikipedical, In mainspace now. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 22:44, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Deuce.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:The Good Fight#About the lead section. — YoungForever^(talk) 16:36, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The same editor is back to restore his or her edits for nth time without discussion. — YoungForever^(talk) 17:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edit here but please don't insert headers with the same name unless it's somehow necessary. That is confusing for MediaWiki software and (e.g.) if you are trying to make an anchor to one of those sections, it's needlessly cumbersome. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:39, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:New60minutes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Run (upcoming TV series). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 6#Run (upcoming TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 22:07, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Lost task force/Archive 2. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 7#Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Lost task force/Archive 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 20:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Lost task force/Archive 1. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 7#Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Lost task force/Archive 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 20:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't do this. ‎ WP:INFOBOXPURPOSE says don't link into the article body from the infobox, and Template:Infobox television says only put a list article (a separate article) into that parameter. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 13:48, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Peter Gould (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:22, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Big Time.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:32, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:50, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tamingimpala was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bokksu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bokksu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tame (talk) 09:17, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikipedical! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tame (talk) 09:17, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Horace Mann School seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Somebody Somewhere (TV series). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 15#Somebody Somewhere (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Narky Blert (talk) 08:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Press releases, interviews and sponsored content (ex. CNN article is not by their news staff and they received a commission) are not reliable sources. Please see the notability guidelines for companies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bokksu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bokksu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:41, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your message. I agree that some shows might benefit from such a column if the episode is mostly centered around them, but Euphoria only uses prologues to explore a particular character's past and these only last a few minutes, so I'm still not convinced this is a beneficial contribution to the article. We could open a discussion on the talk page, though, and see what other contributors think. I would personally remove the featured character from the bottom note section as well, because it's already blatantly obvious from the first sentence of the summary. --TheVampire (talk) 13:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikipedical,

I was looking over some articles you PROD'd and noticed that you didn't post notifications of the deletion tagging on the article creator's talk page. Please do so in the future. Most editors and admins do this by making use of Twinkle to tag articles for all types of deletion. Once you set up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator", then Twinkle will post these notices on your behalf which makes things easy. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:46, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Scenes from a Marriage (upcoming miniseries) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 30#Scenes from a Marriage (upcoming miniseries) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 23:38, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikipedical,

Regarding Cải lương, if you are fixing a bad page move, you often want to leave a redirect behind, not because it makes for a good redirect but because by not leaving a redirect, you create a lot of broken redirects as you can see here. Unfortunately, Wikipedia bots are very swift and when an editor or vandal moves an article to a bad title, all of the existing redirects to that article are changed to point to the new, bad title. If you leave a redirect behind when you move it back to the correct name, then the bots can fix all of these double redirects to point to the correct target again. When you don't leave a redirect behind, then any existing redirects show up on our broken redirect lists. So, I have created a temporary redirect from the bad title to Cải lương. We can always tag this redirect later for speedy deletion once the double redirects are corrected.

The best way to avoid this happening is to check "What links here" before moving an article. If there are a lot of redirects to the page, then leave a redirect behind or you can choose to manually fix all of the redirects yourself. If there are no redirects to the article, then you needn't leave a redirect behind when you are correcting for a bad page move. Thank you for all of your work on the project! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:24, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Einstein has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Federalist Papers has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:05, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

McCarthyism has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:New60minutes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where is my hatnote? You didn't merely move it. You deleted it.

If you don't reverse this action, I will create a disambiguation page, whether it is desirable or not.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:45, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The previous hatnote no longer applies at In the News because In the Know no longer redirects there. Instead, I added a hatnote to In the Know. And your latter comment seems a little aggressive, remaining civil would be appreciated, thanks. -- Wikipedical (talk) 17:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In The Know did still redirect there, so I didn't realize what was taking place. But you didn't make clear where you moved the hatnote to, so I didn't consider that. Sorry.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arrested Development has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of deal of the day services is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of deal of the day services (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]