Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Batman enemies in other media

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Batman family enemies. Most commenters here do not seem particularly interested in merging, but also don't strongly object to it. Accordingly, article history will be left in place for use by anyone who is interested in doing so. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:43, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Batman enemies in other media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the List of Batman family enemies (de facto List of Batman enemies) makes some sense due to popularity of the franchise, this is a weird and small spin-off. What are "other media"? The article suggests it's "not comics", and intends to present a list of characters that debuted outside them (so it's really is a List of Batman enemies that debuted outside the comics). Ok, but how does this meet WP:LISTN? Instead, I am afraid such a categorization meets WP:OR. At best I can suggest this to be merged back to the regular list of Batman's enemies. And I am afraid most if not all entries in Category:Comics characters in other media need similar treatment (see also the recent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poison Ivy in other media, which like most of the entries at least doesn't violate OR due to an attempt to list characters that debuted outside comics, but it was still found to be an unneeded split from the main article). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:27, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as an WP:OR list per nom, and fails WP:LISTN too. No reliable sources establish this as a verifiable concept for a list. Jontesta (talk) 23:32, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete A relic of a time in which Wikipedia was as permissive about fictional cruft as FANDOM, it is totally unencyclopedic for modern Wikipedia and fails LISTN miserably. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 12:37, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Information on where characters first appeared is already part of the main Batman enemies list, and the articles on the various movies and tv shows have character or cast lists where these characters are listed, making this list unnecessary. Rhino131 (talk) 13:37, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge The first edit to this article was 04:49, 10 July 2008‎ Jc37 talk contribs‎ 11,000 bytes +11,000‎ split from List of Batman enemies. That article is now named List of Batman family enemies and is suppose to list supervillains, but just regular villains without super powers, gadgets, or a history of accomplishments are listed as well there. Most of those listed there without their own article probably could be pruned. Anyway, that list shows the characters first appearance in the column "First appearance". If it matters if they first appeared somewhere else, a new column could be created listing if they were first appearing in comic, television, video game, movie, newspaper, or radio broadcast. Someone could then click to sort by that information if anyone cared. Redirecting this article to there, and if anyone sees any valid information not already there, they can then copy it over. Dream Focus 09:18, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:36, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting again.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.