Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Irwin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The proposal to move the article to a new name can be discussed on the article's talk page. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 18:19, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Irwin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another tragic but standard missing person case. "References" are largely news items rather than anything that establishes notability. Dmol (talk) 08:52, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:08, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:08, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep seems to pass WP:GNG trough reliable sourcing and beyond a one - two days standard coverage.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:29, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:12, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The story has been covered significantly both locally and nationally, (national news coverage, television appearances)- I believe this satisfies WP:GNG
Rename Rename to "The Disappearance of Lisa Irwin" Laladoodle92 (talk) 17:26, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.