Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilongwe Wildlife Trust

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While not many comments, those that are here make good policy arguments to keep. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 12:41, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lilongwe Wildlife Trust (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As an environmentalist, it's unfortunate to nominate this but my searches at News, Books, browsers and Highbeam simply found some passing mentions so at best it's only locally best know but here we are at AfD for some insight. In case they're not watching and aware of this AfD, I'm notifying environmentalist Velella who may have som insight and also past users Melcous, Rhododendrites, UY Scuti, Larsona and 220 of Borg for their input. SwisterTwister talk 23:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:51, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.