Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Stolz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn.--218.81.14.78 (talk) 02:49, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Leo Stolz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Player fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 17:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 19:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 19:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 19:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 19:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTBALL as he hasn't played in a fully professional league and he doesn't have any senior international caps. IJA (talk) 19:58, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Fails WP:NFOOTBALL but passes WP:GNG due to winning the Hermann Trophy. IJA (talk) 21:13, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 20:09, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 20:11, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Hasn't yet played in a WP:FPL, no senior international caps, and no significant non-routine coverage. Presently fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. This seems a little premature. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 20:14, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Article needs improvement, but meets WP:NCOLLATH for winning a national award. See press release here. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 20:46, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets WP:NCOLLATH having won the Hermann Trophy. – Michael (talk) 20:35, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets WP:NCOLLATH having won the Hermann Trophy. – Elopez76 (talk) 20:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per other "keep" recommendations above. See also Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 January 19. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:56, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - ArsenalFan700, did you look at any of the background before nominating this? That's part of WP:BEFORE too. The move-to-create was as a result of WP:DRV. You're welcome to nominate it anyway, but it doesn't seem particularly sensible. St★lwart¹¹¹ 05:09, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen article delation debates for players who have won a Hermann Trophy before and honestly I did not know that was enough to get a page created and also, ever since I got on here back in 2010, the majority of DRV's I see which relate to football turn out to still be deletable, just in this case, this player is notable. My mistake it seems. Cheers. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 05:12, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair enough, but the win and his subsequent signing have resulted in significant coverage, so the "fails GNG" part is a stretch too. Doesn't matter, though, you can always withdraw this. St★lwart¹¹¹ 05:20, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - passes WP:NCOLLATH. Fenix down (talk) 13:31, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - passes WP:NCOLLATH. Needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 18:31, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - passes WP:NCOLLATH.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – WP:SNOW? — Jkudlick ^tc_s 05:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.