Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lefaucheux Museum
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lefaucheux Museum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There doesn't appear to be any coverage in reliable sources. toweli (talk) 06:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries, Firearms, Internet, and France. toweli (talk) 06:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:12, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, although some speedy deletion criteria may apply given the article has clearly been written by the owner: https://forum.cartridgecollectors.org/t/so-i-founded-a-museum/59999 Traumnovelle (talk) 06:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete it's sufficiently lifted from the museum's site that it could be a G12, but since it's here... Too soon, no independent coverage found. Star Mississippi 13:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Casimir Lefaucheux -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 13:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- The museum isn't mentioned there, so I don't think it would make much sense to redirect to that page. Perhaps a merge? jlwoodwa (talk) 04:03, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Well, it's not even a museum, it's a website that calls itself a museum, which was created by the person who wrote this article. It doesn't have even a single mention in any sources. So, a merge or a redirect would be giving it too much recognition. toweli (talk) 10:25, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- I agree, it seems like any mention at Casimir Lefaucheux would be WP:UNDUE. In that case, delete. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:36, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Well, it's not even a museum, it's a website that calls itself a museum, which was created by the person who wrote this article. It doesn't have even a single mention in any sources. So, a merge or a redirect would be giving it too much recognition. toweli (talk) 10:25, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- The museum isn't mentioned there, so I don't think it would make much sense to redirect to that page. Perhaps a merge? jlwoodwa (talk) 04:03, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.