Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurent Sky

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Laurent Sky

Laurent Sky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual. No sources can be found to expand upon the article other than a list of awards and nominations. That doesn't make a person notable. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:16, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Find something outside the awards to prove notability. And no, porn awards are not all notable. And how do you know this person is a woman? There is nothing online that states that. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This keep vote is invalid, porn industry awards counting towards notability was specifically deprecated awhile ago. Zaathras (talk) 00:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No sources have been provided in the article to establish notability. Non-notable porn awards and a directory listing do not count. Zaathras (talk) 00:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This director fails WP:FILMMAKER. Note: the article is outdated, and there was an AVN Hall of Fame induction in 2020. However, without independent reliable source coverage, this is yet another won-a-porn-award-but-the-sources-are-bad porn bio. Any claim to passing ANYBIO needs independent reliable sources that verify significance of the award. The consensus since 2019 is that, failing WP:BASIC, porn awards don't indicate notability by themselves. An independent search for RS coverage yielded the usual porn trade churnalism. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: does not meet WP:BASIC / WP:ENT per review of available sources. -- K.e.coffman (talk) 06:10, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.