Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larissa Pacheco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:14, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Larissa Pacheco

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Female MMA fighter with no top tier fights so she fails WP:NMMA. Winning the title of an organization that isn't even considered second tier for women does not show notability. Since she just signed with the UFC she may eventually meet NMMA but that's WP:CRYSTALBALL and it will be awhile before she has 3 top tier fights.Mdtemp (talk) 18:08, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 20:08, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No top tier fights - just signing with the UFC is not nearly enough. If she had at least one top tier win under her belt I would suggest letting it remain but it is just too far in the future to guarantee anything.Peter Rehse (talk) 20:17, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete She fails WP:NMMA since she has no top tier fights. I would say the article was created WP:TOOSOON. Papaursa (talk) 18:15, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.