Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kylun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Marvel Comics characters: K. Content can be merged, or the redirect re-targetted, by editors if desired. Clear consensus here to redirect the article. Daniel (talk) 02:07, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kylun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No coverage outside of trivial mentions in junk listicles. TTN (talk) 14:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 14:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 14:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or merge with List of Marvel Comics characters: K, per WP:PRESERVE and WP:ATD. BOZ (talk) 01:05, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:DON'T PRESERVE. No evidence of any significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that would justify this character having its own article. Avilich (talk) 14:18, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Excalibur (comics). Search term is reasonable, but no secondary sources are apparent. Charcter is briefly covered at redirect target, but a slightly fuller explanation might be better. --Killer Moff- ill advisedly sticking his nose in since 2011 (talk) 09:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to either of the targets proposed above (if pressed I'd prefer List of Marvel Comics characters: K), no evidence this meets WP:GNG, comic-type WP:FANCRUFT, plot summary only. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:11, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect or Merge Insufficient (which is to say no) independent reliable sourcing discussing this character or its significance in the abstract. Indeed, even the non-RS sourcing consists of just two links: what appears to have originally been an index page for various antiquated characters (which btw seems to be a deadlink at present that redirects to the main page for the publisher's website), and marginal more independent but still far from RS fan site character bio. Still, even if notability for an independent article fails, there may be a marginal WP:WEIGHT argument arguing for a smaller summary of the details currently in the article to be ported to articles on related narrative products and their plotlines: I leave that more nuanced call to editors with some experience with the niche subject matter here. SnowRise ^{let's rap} 03:27, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.