Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knut Aga, Jr.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fenix down (talk) 18:34, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Knut Aga, Jr.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD with the wording: "lots of pro games". Still fails WP:NFOOTY as these games came well before the Norwegian men's football league was a 'fully professional league'. Also little evidence of non-routine coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - appears to meet GNG given level of coverage. Giant Snowman 19:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I also disagree with this assessment, did you even bother trying to analyse the citations properly? For instance, the very first source is a newspaper called Aftenposten, But then the first citation is from 1985, so searching for it on their website yielded nothing, but that does not mean the source does not exist. I am going on some faith that it does and there are two linked sources later there. So on overall, I will say he passes GNG. Govvy (talk) 13:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per my comment in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Berg (footballer, born 1943) Mentoz (talk) 03:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.