Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kjetil Lundebakken

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 21:51, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kjetil Lundebakken

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Meets WP:NFOOTBALL due to two very short substitute appearances in an allegedly 'fully professional league' 12 years ago. The rest of his football career was at a much lower level and there is no evidence of any WP:GNG-level coverage. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:32, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:35, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:35, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:35, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:36, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one (or two) appearances is insufficient when GNG was failed comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 21:37, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails notability guidelines.Less Unless (talk) 22:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. not enough coverage to pass general notability guidelines. Rondolinda (talk) 23:05, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Current sources doesn't meet WP:GNG. Hulatam (talk) 12:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I could not find any significant coverage of Lundebakken, meaning that a WP:GNG fail is likely Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG Devoke water 12:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 15:19, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.