Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingsley Chigozie (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:22, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kingsley Chigozie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Player, fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG.

In the previous AfD, there was suggestion that sources indicated full professionalism in the Bangladesh top league. However, additional discussion took place here and no consensus was reached.

Bangladesh remains absent from the WP:FPL listing, so the original concerns still stand. Fenix down (talk) 12:03, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Fenix down (talk) 12:06, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 18:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As nominator of the original AfD. As is spelled out in the nomination, my concerns from a year ago still stand. The claim that he has played in a fully professional league remains unverified, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT, and he has still not received significant coverage, meaning the article still fails WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:07, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:50, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:50, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:51, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per as discussion from 1st nomination. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 14:48, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - on what grounds? the original discussion suggested Bangladesh was FPL, there is no consensus that that is actually the case from a wider discussion post that AfD. Fenix down (talk) 14:55, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep One of the three players selected to be Naturalized to play for Bangladesh National Team. The three would be the first naturalized players to play for Bangladesh national Team. Source:Salahuddin defends naturalisation Vinegarymass911 (talk) 21:33, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - and if they end up playing a full FIFA internationaal then they will be notable per WP:NFOOTY. At the moment though to attempt to support notability based on this possible outcome is a violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Fenix down (talk) 08:30, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As article fails WP:NFOOTBALL (as not played in WP:FPL) and also fails WP:GNG. Qed237 (talk) 22:13, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NFOOTY and there will be No naturalization (published one day after the abovementioned link). Otherwise, web searches turn up only WP:ROUTINE weekly mentions. Kraxler (talk) 15:20, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.