Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khapri Alston

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:06, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Khapri Alston

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Simply doesn't meet WP:GNG, and doesn't pass WP:NBASKETBALL. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:05, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:05, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes WP:GNG per [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] -- Dammit_steve (talk) 23:33, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment He definitely doesn't meet WP:NHOOPS. The coverage I find looks like routine local sports reporting--local for his high school, college, and pro teams. There's also a blog listed. I don't see anything to convince me that WP:GNG is met, but I'll wait to see if better sources are cited. Papaursa (talk) 00:13, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete Fails to meet WP:NHOOPS. Coverage is routine sports coverage and local coverage which is typical of any player at the level he's played so the GNG is not met.Sandals1 (talk) 16:40, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 15:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources have been added since my original comment, so my original reasoning is unchanged and I believe he fails both WP:GNG and WP:NHOOPS. Papaursa (talk) 17:28, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.