Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelsey Lewis (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If such a young actor achieves notability in the futurem then ... Black Kite 00:40, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kelsey Lewis

I think this article should be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charmed871 (talk • contribs) 2009/11/03 23:01:23

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 14:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:05, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:28, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article demonstrates notability, and I added a reference from Money magazine. -- Eastmain (talk) 00:09, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete. This is one of those marginal notability cases where there is just barely enough coverage to create a stub article. The Money article is a profile of the family's finances, the sort of article that could be about any family, without regard to notability. Most other coverage is passing mentions in reviews of her one notable movie. Given that this is a BLP (of a minor child at that), I think we need a bit more. --RL0919 (talk) 20:48, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.