Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith R. Kernspecht

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails GNG. Thanks everyone for your participation and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 16:25, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keith R. Kernspecht

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject doesn’t meet notability guidelines and has his own website as reference. Subject has never been in any news sources nor been on a front cover of a martial arts magazine Australianblackbelt (talk) 15:39, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:06, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:06, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:06, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article is the same as Salih Avci it has only the subjects own website as a source. Jaxbrother (talk) 05:48, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing significant for a person as practitioner in martial arts and no independent relaibel could be found of the subject. Fails WP:GNG CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:04, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG with no significant independent coverage and no indication of meeting any notability criteria for martial artists at WP:MANOTE. Papaursa (talk) 18:55, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG, or WP:MANOTE. Self sourced and sourced to his organization.-- Deep fried okra 10:49, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.