Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Morian
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 23:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Karen Morian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I read the article, and thought about adding several tags for different types of cleanup, but realized if all issues were addressed, there would not be anything left: Several sections are purely trivial. Unfortunately the young lady died recently so in all likelihood the article would forever remain as a stub if it were kept. Most of her parts (from what I gather by reading the article) were in local productions, and the rest does not appear to carry enough notability; "Awards" section doesn't appear to be notable either, and "Death" section contains some POV wording. Only source in article is link to an ad she did; Google search turned up nothing reliable, and Google news search returned nothing. Edit history reveals some WP:COI issues. Will include a "keep" comment if convinced by the discussion and comments which may follow. SoSaysChappy (talk) 04:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - NN. If it didn't already have an AfD I would speedy it as a wp:Hoax.- sinneed (talk) 04:55, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Is it an obvious hoax, or just suspected? If it is blatant, can AfD be withdrawn and article be tagged as CSD? - SoSaysChappy (talk) 06:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Once an AfD is started, I think it normally runs its course. There is no rush here, I think. It has been here a long time and, since it isn't attached to an actual person (I killed the link to the apparently random model's picture), I don't think wp:BLP would apply.- sinneed (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as only appearing in a minor role on Broadway. The rest of the information is trivial background to that, which isn't enough to be notable. ThemFromSpace 05:52, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No verifiable references, so can not be considered of any note. Trevor Marron (talk) 10:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless reliable, independent and neutral references are given Rirunmot (talk) 16:41, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.