Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Tomar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The keep arguments are really stretching the definition of WP:ENT. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:22, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Tomar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The person does not meet WP:CREATIVE and my WP:BEFORE has not revealed any sources which are more than passing mentions. Lightburst (talk) 23:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I would say WP:ENT rather than WP:CREATIVE would apply to Tomar because he is a voice actor. As such, he meets this criteria because he has had a significant role in a lot of movies, tv, and games.

Knowledgegatherer23 (Say Hello) 00:05, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Knowledgegatherer23 Which of his roles you think is significant? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:42, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus I took another look at it. While only a couple of roles are significant, he has had a lot of roles. I'd say it is enough to be a keep. Knowledgegatherer23 (Say Hello) 14:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus The significant roles include Mr. Miller (Barbie) and Storm, King Rouge Wolf (Alpha and Omega 8). Knowledgegatherer23 (Say Hello) 14:53, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Voice actor qualifies under WP:ENT for significant voice roles in many media. Dcotos (talk) 23:38, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More policy based input would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:17, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Comics and animation, and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:40, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:ENT requires the person to have multiple significant roles, I don't think this person passes that criteria since all his roles are supporting roles or "additional voices". Of course a supporting role can be significant but I don't get that from checking the articles on media productions he's appeared in. Also fails WP:GNG since there are no reliable sources talking about the actor. --Mika1h (talk) 00:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. ミラP@Miraclepine 23:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I concur that all of his roles seem to be minor, and GNG is not met. If he is notable, all voice actors would be notable. Note to closer: two keep votes make assertion that he had significant roles, but do not even say which ones. I looked at the list and they all appear to be the very definition of insignificant, minor roles for background characters who had just a few scenes at most.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:41, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.