Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jody Vance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Jenks24 (talk) 10:15, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jody Vance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find notable coverage by secondary sources. Current article lacks in-text citations and excessively promotional in tone. Searching name in Google and Google News to try to find sources gives many Jody Vances, suggesting this individual is not notable enough for own article. Fails WP:NBIO EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non-notable sports journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:02, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no significant coverage in any sources that I could find LAroboGuy (talk) 01:09, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Vance is a well-known national broadcaster in Canada. I've done some clean up to the article and added references. Could use additional clean up and refs, not deletion per WP:DEL and WP:ATD. As is, this article meets WP:GNG criteria. Hmlarson (talk) 03:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Much improved. Thank you for your efforts. Given the improvement and the sourcing, I'm more neutral to weak-keep. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 03:13, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Hmlarson. Adequate indicia of notablity. Montanabw^(talk) 07:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Claim to fame is "she became the first woman in the history of Canadian television to host her own sports show in primetime" that is never substantiated. — Wyliepedia 18:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Some further referencing improvement is still needed here, but Hmlarson has done enough to demonstrate that she does pass WP:GNG regardless of any quibbles about whether any individual detail in here passes an SNG or not. Bearcat (talk) 19:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.