Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/João Pedro Sorgi

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:59, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

João Pedro Sorgi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable tennis player. No major appearances or Challenger titles. Fails WP:NTENNIS. Adamtt9 (talk) 00:51, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Sorgi was a top ten juniors player, but missed out on the top 3 that is required for inherent notability. No notable wins in Juniors either, with his best appearance being a Juniors Doubles QF at the 2011 US Open. SellymeTalk 02:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
But playing in ATP World Tour is enough according to Wiki Tennis guidelines, while Sorgi hasn't met any of them. And Sorgi doesn't meet WP:GNG either. Adamtt9 (talk) 12:22, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, then just delete it, as being outside the top 1000 with a 0–1 Tour record is more notable for the guidelines. When Sorgi meet one of the requirements, I'll republish it. OneTennisEditor (talk) 18:10, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:OTHERSTUFF. If you are that frustrated about the existence of Assumpção's article, go ahead and nominate it for deletion. It has little chance of being kept, looking at how little the man achieved. Getting one Wild Card for one ATP tournament doubles draw and losing that only match winning just three games is not the same as playing on the ATP World Tour.Tvx1 21:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I see no notability with this player. Fyunck(click) (talk) 17:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.