Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Alldis Sr.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I don't see a consensus to redirect. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:42, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Alldis Sr.

Jim Alldis Sr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article since its creation in 2006. Fails WP:SIGCOV. 4meter4 (talk) 16:56, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Middlesex County Cricket Club#Club scorers Delete Not seeing enough for a WP:GNG pass and he didn't play any FC/LA cricket or manage any notable teams. Redirect a suitable WP:ATD here. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From reading other members of the WikiProjects's views it seems that the preference is deletion over redirect. Maybe the section should be removed from Middlesex County Cricket Club page. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 15:32, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect as above. Wholly unsourced. RobinCarmody (talk) 21:04, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I'm not sure a redirect is appropriate here. At best a redirect to his son's article? StickyWicket (talk) 20:27, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete being a county level scorer isn't included in any notability criteria that I can find. The Middlesex article is odd in that it has a list of scorers on it - that's OK, but not all of them are clearly not notable. There's no reason to look for a redirect here - and the title is unlikely to be a search term anyway. Jim Alldis, which currently redirects to this article, should be the subject of Jim Alldis Jr.. From the list of Middlesex scorers, I'd say Don Shelley needs deleting as well. He still appears to be the Middlesex scorer, but it's not the easiest piece of information to find out - I'd support deleting the section from the Middlesex page - I'm not sure that much of the officers or staff content is really necessary in many ways. Blue Square Thing (talk) 08:29, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete assuming that Middlesex's scorers are removed from that page, otherwise redirect to Middlesex County Cricket Club#Club scorers. Either way, no need for an article on someone who will never pass WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:17, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• County officials/employees like scorers (and Jim Sims also appears to have been manager of Middlesex's Cricket school [1]) can be notable, but I'm not seeing the sort of coverage that would be needed to get past WP:GNG - he doesn't appear to have an obituary in the relevant Wisden, for example.Nigel Ish (talk) 11:12, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete There is not much significant coverage. 1друг (talk) 19:35, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:NCRIC and WP:GNG and there is really no subject specific guidelines for club scorers, unless they meet wider requirements of WP:GNG. — A.A Prinon  ^{Leave a dialogue} 16:01, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.