Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Ruffner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Ruffner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PRODded by BoomboxTestarossa (talk · contribs) with with concern issues not addressed for 10+ years, no evidence on Google that subject is any more notable than numerous other comics colorists who have a small number of professional credits, then deprodded by StarTrekker (talk · contribs) for alleged mass PROD, but then reinstated by BoomboxTestarossa. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Comics and animation. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete NO sources for this person found. The name is too common. Oaktree b (talk) 20:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - sadly no evidence Ms. Ruffner is notable even within the undercovered field of comic colourists. Not even really a standout association to redirect to IMHO. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 16:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.