Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Washington

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nominator Withdraw. (non-admin closure) NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 01:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Washington

The subject not notable as an individual, simply as the subject of an infamous event. At least, merge to "Waco Horror," or the main article describing the totality of the event. Pepe Machao (talk) 03:27, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the standard, then we should delete Emmett Till's page, too, since he didn't do anything notable except get lynched. The point is, his case was important and significant. Waco Horror redirects to this page already, so we can't merge this page to it. The point is, there are plenty of people who didn't achieve anything great in their lifetimes, but whose deaths were extremely notable and historically important. Jesse Washington is one such person, so his page should remain. I just looked him up the other day, and I can't believe I'm the only one.QuizzicalBee (talk) 04:31, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I really enjoyed the entry (from a historical point of view) and believe it is well written, present a notable event and person and has the beginning of some good reference material. Royalhistorian (talk) 06:17, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--I don't see any problems with this article. Notable historical event with reliable reference. --Jmundo (talk) 07:25, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep AfD is not the place for merge discussions. ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:21, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:37, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:37, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:37, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE, I changed the title and kept the text, therefore making the deletion nomination moot. Pepe Machao (talk) 19:12, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.