Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jess Lemon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to MasterChef Australia (series 10). Mojo Hand (talk) 23:21, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jess Lemon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject was an unsuccessful contestant in a television cooking competition. Nothing notable in the article. Fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:ENTERTAINER. Most references are tabloid puff pieces or self-published sources. WWGB (talk) 02:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Television, and Australia. WWGB (talk) 02:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to MasterChef Australia (series 10) where she is mentioned. LibStar (talk) 02:35, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to MasterChef Australia (series 10) per LibStar and the nominator. And just to review WP:NBASIC, the sources need to be "substantial" in coverage. Neither the headlines nor the contents of the articles focus on the actual person, Jess Lemon, in detail, merely describing her in the context of non-notable events. Such pieces exist covering an incredibly large number of people, but it isn't practical to have an article on every non-notable TV contestant. The sources used by the creator indiscriminately publish streams of such stories, so referring to them as "puff pieces" isn't incorrect. The creator should also refrain from accusing the nominator of having a "sexist" opinion because they hold this view. Nythar (💬-🍀) 10:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For me it's a weak Keep. The Who piece is certainly a puff piece, but they do have editorial oversight, and it's sigcov. The first Mammamia story, same. The Yahoo news story is shortish, but I think it gets her over the hump. I think the fact so many of the sources mention her popularity with fans probably explains why a 4th-runner-up got so much coverage. It's the kind of celebrity bs coverage I hate to use, but it's independent, reliable, and significant. Valereee (talk) 16:58, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per Valereee. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 23:13, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to MasterChef Australia (series 10) — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 00:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to MasterChef Australia (series 10). Coverage is routine for a reality-TV contestant. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:29, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.