Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeet Rama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The editor whose username is Z0 08:44, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jeet Rama

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notable wrestler. It's just a develoment wrestler with WWE with just a few matches. It's too son for this article. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:41, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:46, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:46, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:46, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - has reliable third party coverage from both India Times and Times of India (which seem to be seperate entities) So to me he meets the WP:GNC due to that. MPJ-DK 22:05, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Soft Delete-Per WP:TOOSOON.The coverage looks encouraging. If the subject wins anything then I am sure we will have enough coverage. Up-till now it is only interviews. — F R ⁺ 06:42, 4 June 2018 (UTC)See below[reply]
Keep Sources kept seem enough for WP:GNG. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:34, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Seems to be enough to support WP:GNG - Galatz ^Talk 17:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:40, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Indian WWE and has RS. Good for wikipedia, surely interesting. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 08:10, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep-After carefully consideration of the sources I concur with the other voters — F R ⁺ 14:54, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.