Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Hunt
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Resistance is futile! Mailer Diablo 00:36, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I gave this one a prod template, but the author removed oit without comment, so I'm listing here for concensus. Subject is a non-notable webmaster and graphic designer. Google gives very few hits (76 total, less than 25 unique) for "jason hunt" "natural child project". No secondary sources are provided. This individual just is not noteworthy enough for Wikipedia (please note the page creator is User:Janhunt). — orioneight (talk) 23:27, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per myself. — orioneight (talk) 23:29, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- What google are you looking at? i got 10,400,000 hits. Keep ILovePlankton 23:41, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Eh? A Google search for just the name of "Jason Hunt" brings up 37,800 as a number. How you got 10 million hits is beyond me... Searching with other related terms brought it down below 100. — TheKMantalk 23:46, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- And by 10,400,000 you meant 76, right? :-P — orioneight (talk) 23:49, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There's a difference between phrases, names in quotes, and names without quotes. Hope this helps :) Adrian~enwiki (talk) 05:06, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Wikipedical 23:57, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn.Blnguyen 03:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn vanity. dbtfztalk 05:49, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, no assertion of notability. (Should have been done in the first place instead of bothering with PROD.) Angr/talk 21:12, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This gallery has collaborated with Unicef, is very well-known and esteemed among those who study children's art, and has collected over 1,000 pictures and paintings from 66 countries over a 9-year period, the largest such collection on the Internet. What definition of "noteworthy" does this website not meet? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jennie7 (talk • contribs) .
- The article we are discussing is not about a website or art gallery. — orioneight (talk) 17:38, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep True but it wouldn't exist without the 9 years of donated time Jason has given to this project (I've had the good fortune to meet this very dedicated young man). 1000+ children around the world have been given the joy and encouragement of seeing their artwork on the Internet. Where else could we find the future artists of the world than among the children of today? If anyone who has voted "delete" has an unfulfilled childhood dream, please reconsider. James McKenzie —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jamesmck (talk • contribs) .
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.