Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Considine
Appearance
The result of the debate was delete. – Jitse Niesen (talk) 23:07, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity. Suspect non-notability, but not 100% certain, so using AFD instead of Speedy. Definitely totally non-encyclopedic. TexasAndroid 19:34, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]