Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/János Birtalan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 20:46, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

János Birtalan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite playing one minute of professional league football almost 10 years ago, there seems to be very little evidence of a WP:GNG pass, which would be required if the article is to be kept. See recent AfDs for Márk Kónya and Tamás Csepregi for this consensus. Google News and a Hungarian source search have a few hits but none of the coverage is in any significant depth at all. He, for example, gets passing mentions in Nemzeti Sport but this clearly doesn't count towards notability in any way. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 21:25, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The notion someone could become notable for one minute of play time, unless that one minute receives a large amount of coverage, is just ludicrous, and is one of the main problems with some of our sport SNGs at present. Even actors and actresses need "multiple" roles that are "significant" in multiple "notable" productions. Someone might have a notable role where they only appear on screen for 1-minute, but that is very rare. Why we allow one game play to put people into the notable column for some sports I have never understood.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.