Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International cricket in 2003

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Jack | ^{talk page} 10:02, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

International cricket in 2003

I am also nominating the following related pages because they fail the same criteria:

Delete all. Breach of WP:IINFO, especially WP:NOTSTATS and WP:DIRECTORY. All of this information belongs in the respective season or tour reviews in suitably summary form. An annual collection of bare statistics is what people look for on specialist sites like CricketArchive and ESPNcricinfo. Articles on WP must have narrative to explain both concept and context. These stats are of no use to anyone who is unfamiliar with cricket and of little if any interest to cricket followers too. A complete waste of space and, unfortunately, something we in WP:CRIC are finding all too often. Jack | ^{talk page} 20:41, 15 November 2016 (UTC) Jack | ^{talk page} 20:41, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 21:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 21:34, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I believe these are acceptable under WP:NSEASONS as they contain descriptive prose (or links to "See Also"s with prose). These aren't statistics, they're logs, which are a little different. I try not to stick my grubby mitts into sports stuff here, but I'm a sucker for data scrounging and summary like this. Take my input with a grain of salt. Jergling (talk) 21:37, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. Useful summaries of results. These are not individual team seasons, but more akin to league seasons - e.g. 2016 NFL season. The fact that they don't currently contain much prose is irrelevant per WP:NOTFINISHED. St Anselm (talk) 23:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
keep all per StAnselm and Jergling. These are essentially a table of contents for all the fixtures in a given season, aiding navigation for the reader in conjunction with the categories and templates. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 09:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Nomination to be withdrawn as a snow keep. Thanks, all. I'll keep a watch on these and maybe add some narrative when I have time for them. Jack | ^{talk page} 10:02, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.