Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Bodyguard Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 20:48, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

International Bodyguard Association

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails basic rules of WP:ORG. There is no evidence of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Only sources are the org's own site and a single news article about the man that runs it that is less than complimentary. Legitimus (talk) 18:14, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Searches found nothing significant and notable here, here, here and here. SwisterTwister talk 21:03, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:37, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete but here is another source if someone wants to have a go at it. source I would recommend they create it in a user space first — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jadeslair (talk • contribs) 17:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, notability is not inherited. While the man may be notable (which might not be the case, actually), this organization certainly is not. Kage Acheron (talk) 00:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the organization is not notable, no significant coverage whatsoever. SpeedDemon520 (talk) 00:26, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:42, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.