Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent Motorsports Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:31, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Independent Motorsports Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A PROD tag was removed but without, in my opinion, addressing the reasons the tag was applied. This organization's name does not provide any results from a Google News search and all references found on a search were not reliable sources. All current references are to the organization's own materials. Notability might be being asserted but I was unable to bolster it with any arm's-length third-party expert sources of opinion. Ubelowme _U ^Me 21:17, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - I see that the article is held up by some references, and information is sustainable, but it appears that content is from the organization's own materials, as you said. My own reference search does not also bode well, and as such I am for a weak delete under the guideline that "Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed." --TheAustinMan^(Talk|Works) 22:07, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 22:36, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 22:36, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 22:36, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The organisation only formed in 2011. I can find no coverage about this in reliable sources. The sourcring in the article is all primary. -- Whpq (talk) 16:35, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I could not find any news coverage at all about this one-year-old auto racing organization. Not even a mention. --MelanieN (talk) 20:56, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.