Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imran Khan (cricketer, born September 1973)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. TheSandDoctor Talk 20:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Imran Khan (cricketer, born September 1973) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. Nothing in my searches. Störm (talk) 20:19, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Has played 5 FC and 13 List-A matches, clearly passing him for WP:NCRIC. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - as with a huge range of other AfDs, the correct standard is not WP:GNG, but WP:CRIN which is passed by virtue of playing many first class and List A cricket matches. This shouldn't even be a discussion. DevaCat1 (talk) 17:53, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep played multiple LA and FC matches, meeting WP:NCRIC. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete none of the sources are close to meeting GNG. The cricket guidelines have been shown to be junk that in no way predict meeting GNG. These are the only debates I have seen where editors think that such sub-standard sourcing is a good way to keep articles. It is not.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.