Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMG Models

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to IMG (company). -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 00:02, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IMG Models

IMG Models (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet general notability guidelines. Mostly consists of a list of people represented by the firm, for which notability is not inherited would apply. {{u|zchrykng}} {T|C} 21:57, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:21, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:23, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:24, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:24, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:25, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:25, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:26, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Selective Merge to IMG (company): WP:ATD-M that will improve the suggested merge target article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:22, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge No WP:NEXIST evidence of independent notability. Merge to IMG (company). Aoziwe (talk) 06:24, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to IMG (company) as the merge target is more notable and can easily cover any important information about this subject. Orientls (talk) 17:49, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to IMG (company) --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 20:13, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Selective Merge to IMG (company) omitting the virtually unreferenced list of models which is unlikely to be kept up to date. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:53, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to IMG (company) and drop the list; I'm happy to rely on the category Category:IMG Models models in this situation due to the promotional/maintenance issues. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:15, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.