Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hosem Animation Studio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:37, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hosem Animation Studio

Hosem Animation Studio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:ORG. I was unable to source this being a subsidiary of Hong Ying Animation, so a merge may not be appropriate. There may be sources in Chinese, but it's difficult to know where to look. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Ying Animation. Adam9007 (talk) 14:35, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 14:52, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 14:52, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the creator of the article ought to be well aware by now that articles about corporations should be extensively sourced, yet continues to create articles without sourcing them. Hong Ying Animation, Sandman Animation Studio, Horseman Cao. And I'm not even mentioning the articles that have already been deleted. Maybe sources exist in Chinese, but it is entirely unreasonable to create unsourced stubs and expect other editors to perform WP:BEFORE and come up non-English sources. Recreation, once sources become available, is not hindered by deletion because there is no usable information in these articles to start with. Vexations (talk) 14:54, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• It's going to be either delete, or merge into Hong Ying Animation, depending on whether the latter survives its own AfD discussion. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 18:42, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete. There is nothing out there in English. I'd feel more comfortable if we had a Chinese-speaking editor to review the sources, but at the very least there is the red flag of no interwiki to zh wiki, so there's that. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:49, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.