Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historical Diving Society
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If significant coverage can be found, contact me and we can revisit this decision and perhaps move the article to Draft or User space. Liz Read! Talk! 01:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Historical Diving Society
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Historical Diving Society (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not-notable hobby organisation. No sign of sufficient independent coverage. Jdcooper (talk) 00:34, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Jdcooper (talk) 00:34, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: fails WP:GNG. I could not find coverage outside of references like "this person was a member". ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 02:42, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and United Kingdom. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:11, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: No WP:SIGCOV present. Sources i found on GNEWS were mostly passing mentions. Jamiebuba (talk) 09:05, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. Searches across Wikipedia Library (using the cross-database search function which is handy) and ProQuest generate well over a hundred results, even after discounting all the journal articles that were likely published by the Historical Diving Society itself. This is going to take a long time to sort through. I wouldn't rush to suggest that coverage doesn't exist. (But yes, the current state of the article is not good.) Cielquiparle (talk) 22:43, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.