Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hill jumping

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:36, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hill jumping

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has had no sources and has been tagged as such since July 2007. It makes several very dubious claims, and falls under WP:NFT. I can find no evidence that the term "yumping" has been used to describe this activity and in any case Wikipedia is not a dictionary. -- Selket ^Talk 01:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree with nom. Seems to be an attempt at a WP:DICDEF without the aid of reliable sources. Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 02:16, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - specialized sport jargon. Non-reliable sources leave this in the delete bucket.

Merge with rallying. Clearly most of the references in the page refer to that sport, so it's fine as a section in that article. Steven Walling 02:33, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 03:11, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as dicdef... although I have to say when I first read the article's name, my mind somehow transposed the H and the J... Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:47, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article says nothing interesting, and although Wikipedia is not a dictionary, 'Hill Jumping' hardly needs defining, even if WP were. ARDawson (talk) 11:02, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.