Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Higher education in the Northwest Territories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as the article is an expandable stub and has potential; reliable references are availible. - Diligent Terrier (and friends)18:12, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Higher education in the Northwest Territories

Delete, original research, short article. GreenJoe 21:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment What about the source, here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mendaliv (talk • contribs) 21:15, 18 June 2008

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.
Keep. I added a sentence about Aurora College, a postsecondary institution in the Northwest Territories which already has an article. --Eastmain (talk) 22:41, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's just a stub now, but there's nothing that appears to be OR. This topic is useful to have, complements other articles (see Category:Higher education in Canada), and simply needs some attention. This stub has potential. Mind matrix 23:04, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Stub at the present but expandable. DoubleBlue (Talk) 23:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- DoubleBlue (Talk) 23:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Acceptable stub. It can be expanded in future. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 03:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - apparently the only such institution in the NWT is Aurora; but that's not their fault. --Orange Mike | Talk 03:35, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really see how this constitutes OR, and there's no law against short articles (a/k/a stubs) on Wikipedia as long as they're referenced. Keep. Bearcat (talk) 02:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
KeepThere is an increasing amount of editors who are helping these students learn about Wikipedia...Class project. The combination of the articles has been a great improvement to wikipedia. This one just needs a little more attention. Be patient. SriMesh | talk 02:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this stub with potential, as others have argued effectively. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:17, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The deadline for the Class project is now June 30th for the provinces & territories component. A total of eighteen people are organized into teams of one or two to work on one or two pages in addition to other offline coursework. Although I'm not working on this page, it's likely they're taking care of some offline research before getting back to it for more updates before June 30th. After the 30th (details still being organized), a smaller group of five or six students will work on the parent level & associated pages (e.g., Higher education in Canada) as well as clean up and additions with the provinces & territories (e.g., Aboriginal higher education topics). If possible, please flag pages with concerns where appropriate and allow an extended grace period for them to be fixed. Adhe536ontario2008 (talk) 06:17, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Mindmatrix. I note that there are several reliable source references in the article now. Acceptable stub and, per Adhe536 above, reason to believe the article will be expanded in the near future. Risker (talk) 14:07, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.