Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High school ice hockey in Michigan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 13:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

High school ice hockey in Michigan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just not notable. Entirely sourced to WP:MILL directory-style coverage. Zero entries on the list (hockey programs) are notable by themselves. Borderline WP:CRUFT. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 02:16, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 02:16, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 02:16, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:02, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no indication of notability whatsoever. And "High school hockey" is not the same thing as hockey played by by high school kids. Why are there amateur teams that don't compete in the MHSAA in this list? Trying to shoehorn in something not referenced to the MHSAA perhaps? This is all copied from the MHSAA website and that's where it should stay. John from Idegon (talk) 05:07, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this does not meet any criteria for notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:18, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails to meet WP:LISTN. Individual schools may be notable, but grouping them by programs is not discussed by multiple reliable resources to notability for a standalone list. This violates WP:FANCRUFT also. Flibirigit (talk) 00:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I'm having a hard time justifying this, but it seems like a very reasonable list. So IAR I guess. Hobit (talk) 18:12, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.