Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hero of the Luhansk People's Republic

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Luhansk People's Republic. Similar to corresponding AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hero of the Donetsk People's Republic, consensus here not to retain, going merge as an ATD that was discussed and had similar support to delete. Daniel (talk) 18:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hero of the Luhansk People's Republic

Hero of the Luhansk People's Republic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG, only one source which mentions the award in passing. Rsk6400 (talk) 12:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with Russian-language sources is that there is no freedom of the press left in Russia. Notability cannot be established by sources that are unreliable because they are controlled by the Kremlin. The last of the four sources (Кавказ.Реалии) seems to be reliable, but it doesn't contain more than a statement about the winners of that award. Rsk6400 (talk) 14:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Award serves to prop up Russian propaganda claims to a region of Ukraine and award is emblem of occupation and not notable on it's own right. Could create new page on Russian attempts to assert administrative control. Stoptheprop (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 18:48, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:45, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Just because it is award of an internationatly unrecognized entity doesn't mean it isn't notable, we have articles for Artsakh awards. Nor does the lack of SIGCOV in English sources mean anything, there is lots of SIGCOV in Russian and Ukrainian sources.Kursant504 (talk) 12:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete. Award serves to prop up Russian propaganda claims to a region of Ukraine and award is emblem of occupation and not notable in it's own right. Could create new page on Russian attempts to assert symbolic/administrative control. Stoptheprop (talk) 28 October 2023 (UTC) information Note: Duplicate vote. Already voted above.Shaan SenguptaTalk 12:51, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.