Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Milner (Police Officer)
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Henry Milner (Police Officer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A distinguished by unnotable career. Many other officers could have the same said about them. DJ Clayworth (talk) 17:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. - a good and useful career but that's not the same as notable. JohnCD (talk) 18:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Made in good faith, but the subject is not notable per WP:BIO. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 20:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. TrekFanatic (talk) 21:32, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep per WP:BIO, that a person winning multiple notable awards is notable. QPM and QCB seem to me to be sufficient. Nyttend (talk) 23:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability aside, there is not a single referenced source for the information contained in the article needed to verify the claims within. LakeBoater (talk) 23:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep if references are added before close of this AfD. WP:BIO states that someone is notable if "The person has received a notable award or honor, or has been often nominated for them", which is certainly claimed in the article - The Queen's Police Medal and Queen's Commendation for Bravery amongst others. But there is no verification so third party sources are needed. Ros0709 (talk) 23:53, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This man has had a distinguished career, for sure, but he does not meet Wikipedia's notability standards. This man is not the subject of published, secondary source material. On this ground, he completely misses the mark on coming anywhere close to holding up to the biography notability standards. Scapler (talk) 21:30, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete single purpose account devoted to Milner family - probable vanity article Dreamspy (talk) 20:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:34, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per LakeBoater. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.