Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hennadiy Perepadenko

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 16:40, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hennadiy Perepadenko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 13:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Ukraine. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 13:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Article about a notable footballer (named to Soviet "all-star" list in 1991, represented the Soviet Union internationally, played several seasons of professional football) which has some recent online Russian-language coverage that approaches SIGCOV (unfortunately, most of the coverage involves interviews with the subject). If I could access the Sport Express archives, I would expect to find more in-depth coverage while he has playing. I think the same is true for Spanish-language newspaper archives, although Mundo Deportivo's is online and most of that coverage is trivial. Overall, the article is close on the GNG, and common sense suggests if we had offline newspaper access, it would meet it easily. Jogurney (talk) 15:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:47, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep National team player. Sources should be searched in Cyrillic (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) --Yakudza (talk) 11:24, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I have found a number sources in Spanish about the subject [1] [2] [3]. Quite possibly there are more of him in Cyrillic. --Angelo (talk) 23:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Hmm, clearly since the nomination there has been plenty improvement on the article to justify its inclusion on Wikipedia. I feel there is enough coverage for GNG. Govvy (talk) 17:53, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - meets GNG. GiantSnowman 10:15, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep passes WP:GNG with the sources that have been found recently. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:37, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep clearly passes GNG.--Ortizesp (talk) 17:54, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.