Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helge Aune

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fenix down (talk) 18:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Helge Aune

Helge Aune (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD disputed with "loads and loads of pro games". But the top Norwegian men's football league is only listed as a 'fully professional league' from 2001. This player was active when the league was predominantly part-time, so fails WP:NFOOTY, also fails WP:GNG. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See recent discussion/consensus at WT:FPL Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you have any evidence for this assertion that most of the league was 'fully pro' in the 1990s you can add it to the ongoing research here. Until then I fear any speculation might be on your part. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, 'featured prominently' in some WP:ROUTINE match previews etc. in his local paper. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.