Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haz al-Din

Haz al-Din (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GNG. Most sources are links to social media sites (specifically YouTube and X) which aren't reliable. Also, COI issues are evident and possible self-promotion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:45, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Lebanon, and United States of America. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:45, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Nearly all of the current references are social media links which are pretty useless for a WP:BLP. The only ref I could find is from the Guardian [1]. I haven't spent hours searching for WP:RS. I would suggest this person fails WP:N WP:SIGCOV or WP:BIO. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knitsey (talk • contribs) 22:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Obvious issues with notability, and the vast majority of the sources are directly from the subject's social media, and by no means are reliable. This article also suffers from clear political bias and MOS:PUFFERY (e.g. "He is renowned..."). The author also appears to be clearly invested in this topic and possess a conflict of interest. SociusMono1976 (talk) 23:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• While this is somewhat separate from the content of this article (and therefore this should not be seen as a !vote), it's worth noting that this article was created by a user who repeatedly is seeking to recreate the page of a non-notable political party deleted at AfD, and has now instead pivoted to one about its founder (while again recreating the deleted one in two different new pages...).--Yaksar (let's chat) 23:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Page appears to have been created as an alternative workaround after other attempts to circumvent a page deleted at AfD were removed. That being said, I agree with the !votes above regarding the current sourcing (but am open to revising that pending different sources and after further research).--Yaksar (let's chat) 00:07, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Best I can find are a mention here [2] and here [3]. Daily Kos isn't a RS, the ADL was up for discussion for reliability recently... Regardless, two mentions don't work for RS and what's used in the article is primary/social media. Nothing we can use to prove notability. Oaktree b (talk) 03:07, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics, Internet, and Michigan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Notability is not a matter of what the person says about themselves, nor even what their friends say about them. Notability is a matter of what independent sources have to say.Gronk Oz (talk) 06:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: spectacularly fails N and GNG. Stanley Joseph Wilkins (talk) 06:13, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: per above. That subject doesn't have enough notability in different reliable sources.

Ahri Boy (talk) 01:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]