Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harlequin Ladies Football Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Harlequins Women. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:42, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Harlequin Ladies Football Club

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is unsourced and despite my best efforts, unsourceable. There are claims replicated from their homepage, such as first full members of RFU, that might provide for notability, but I am unable to verify this. All I can find is the occasional game blotter from the Sue Moloney Cup but nothing approaching sports or organizational notability. It's unclear whether the club still exists, so not a case of TOOSOON. Thoughts? Note: this is not Harlequins Women. This article is about an amateur team of the same name, color palette. Star Mississippi 00:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Rugby union, and England. Star Mississippi 00:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Harlequins Women Lots of this is non-notable/irrelevant, can very easily be covered selectively in a section on the main Harlequins Women page. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 08:36, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:34, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Can Merge any relevant citable parts into either Harlequin F.C. or Harlequins Women Skeene88 (talk) 13:01, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting because since you've done the research, Star Mississippi, I'd like to know what you think of these proposals for merger.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:55, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Liz. I personally think Harlequins Women makes more sense than the broader club since what little I can find on the amateur club focused on it being for women. I'm not sure there's more than a sentence worth merging, but I don't see this as a scenario where it would be inappropriate. Any more than that is likely to be a DUE issue as well as uncited material. Star Mississippi 02:42, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback, Star Mississippi! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.